Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model

Nico Williams <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:47:49 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <CAK3OfOiDixHorTr2qBBj-wNJdv+8_M4d_vLay0aqXMX1cFzNdA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm talking about a locked attribute with no special semantics to read
>> nor write.  It'd be deleting the principal to lock and re-creating the
>> principal to unlock, say, or deleting its keys and re-creating them,
>> or setting a disallow-tix flag, only, of course, simpler than that.
>> Speaking of which, I don't see that MIT krb5 attribute in the I-D
>> (disallow-tix).
>
> It's 4.1.1.4, principalIsDisabled

That's what I get for not having done a case-insensitive search.

OK, so I'm for removing 4.1.1.5, 4.1.1.6, and 4.1.1.7.

Nico
--
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg