Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:44:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:01 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > OK. I *think* that everyone can live with removing the attributes and > making no other changes. Sorry for being late, I was traveling this week. > 1) Is there anyone who objects strongly to that? I think the current proposal is better than the previous text. > 2) does anyone see a set of changes they personally would prefer to > removing the attributes that they think might be able to gain consensus? I am not opposed to retaining them if made optional, but I have no strong preference between making them optional and just removing them. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg