Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-02.txt

Hi Greg,

Thanks for that. I'll leave it a couple of days before
sending the approval announcement in case someone spots
something.

The RFC editor won't like the reference in the abstract but
I guess that can be moved to section 1 - I'll put in an RFC
editor note for that, so no need for a new version unless
something else needs changing.

Cheers,
S.

On 10/01/2012 09:06 PM, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 03:59 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-02.txt
> 
> This revision addresses comments received from IESG review and a couple
> from Ken Raeburn.  The changes are all clarity and consistency improvements:
> 
> * Reference RFC 3962 for ciphertext stealing.
> * Swap key derivation and string-to-key sections to avoid a forward
>   reference.
> * Consistently use "random-to-key" instead of random2key.
> * For key derivation, add a forward reference for random-to-key and a
>   reference to RFC 3961 for k-truncate.
> * Consistently use K(i) as a subscript to avoid confusion with Ke, Ki,
>   etc..
> * Explicitly specify the output length of the CMAC for checksums.
> * Rename the section title "Kerberos Algorithm Parameters" to
>   "Encryption Algorithm Parameters" for better parallelism with the
>   checksum parameters section title.
> * In the parameters sections, reference the RFC 3961 section the
>   parameters are conforming to.
> * Explicitly specify a string-to-key parameter format in the
>   encryption parameters section.
> * Specify default string-to-key parameters in the proper order.
> * Removed "editor" role from my author entry.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-krb-wg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg
> 
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg