Re: HDLC Timers
Javi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And another question. Terminals have usually setup a value for the L2 timers. If you need "tweaking though" them, it would have to be done in all the terminals, which doesn't seem rasonable. And, generally, L2 timers negotiation is not implemented. Which is the solution of L2TPv3+PWE then? -Javi Ignacio Goyret escribió: > At 20:51 6/27/2006 +0200, Javi wrote: > >> I have a question related to transport of HDLC frames over L2TPv3 (RFC 4349): >> >> HDLC identifies a number of timers that may be used by an HDLC link (which >> is operating in the reliable ABM Mode) to provide reliable data transmission, >> such as the Acknowledgement Timer (T1). >> >> How are these timers managed in transport of HDLC frames over L2TPv3 and PWEs?. >> The transport over IP may result in an expiration of the timers. >> >> Javi >> > > I would expect the timers to work the same way as they do over a regular > point to point link. > > Depending on the quality of the link between the LCCEs, the expiration times > may need tweaking though. > > -Ignacio > > _______________________________________________ > L2tpext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext > >