Re: 6MAN cross-wg review: draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01

As Jinmai already wrote, I can volunteer, but only under the same constrains, as I have no prior 
experience with reviews.

Some comments:
I know it is also written in RFC4719, but why was "or" used at "Ethernet frame, without the 
preamble or frame check sequence (FCS)".
At the payload section is "and" used...
"As noted above preamble and FCS are stripped before encapsulation."

As already written by Jinmai, the hop limit is with 255 as a default setting a bit high, a default of 
64 should be high enough for nearly all cases.

Kind regards
Karsten

Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 12:14:14 schrieb Ole Troan:
> Hi,
> 
> The chairs of l2tpext have asked for a 6man review of:
> 
> Title: Keyed IPv6 Tunnel
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01
> 
> Can we get a couple of volunteers please? As well as any other comments to
> the lists are welcome of course. Please keep [email protected] in CC.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ole
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
L2tpext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext