RE: Missed "Added" field for pahawh2, pahawh3, pahawh4 variants

Doug Ewell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dave,
Thanks for discovering this. I'll get in touch with our IANA contact again.
--Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
-------- Original message --------From: Dave Pifke <[email protected]> Date: 1/20/17  18:10  (GMT-07:00) To: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Missed "Added" field for pahawh2, pahawh3, pahawh4 variants 
RFC 5646 section 3.1.2. Record and Field Definitions states that each 
entry in the registry MUST contain at least one instance of Added.

The entries for pahawh2, pahawh3, and pahawh4 as they currently exist in 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry 
are missing this field.

I assume this was an oversight and can be easily corrected.

I have some Go code which downloads and parses the registry.  If there's 
interest, I'd be happy to submit an automated test suite to catch these 
sorts of errors prior to publication.


--
Dave Pifke, [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.