Re: Missed "Added" field for pahawh2, pahawh3, pahawh4 variants

"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <E16A542BEB894F9DA7D811EFE3E55D8E@DougEwell>
Dave Pifke wrote:

> The entries for pahawh2, pahawh3, and pahawh4 as they currently exist
> in
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry
> are missing this field.
>
> I assume this was an oversight and can be easily corrected.

This was my mistake. The proposed records I posted at [1] were missing 
the Added field.

I was on vacation at the time, and the errors escaped the one-week 
review period without being spotted (only the registration form requires 
the full two weeks), but this was still my responsibility. Probably I 
copied and pasted the records directly from the registration forms, 
which never include an Added date (see Figure 5), and forgot to add it.

I was busy last night, but Amanda Baber at IANA figured out what needed 
to be done, confirmed them with me, made the necessary changes, and 
posted a corrected Registry around 7 pm local time on a Friday night. 
This was definitely an "above and beyond" moment and I want to thank 
Amanda for her dedication and expertise in getting this done.

> RFC 5646 section 3.1.2. Record and Field Definitions states that each
> entry in the registry MUST contain at least one instance of Added.

Actually, the spec is a bit loose here: every entry must have *exactly* 
one Added field. It would make no sense for a record to have two; I'd 
consider that a structural error.

> I have some Go code which downloads and parses the registry.  If
> there's interest, I'd be happy to submit an automated test suite to
> catch these sorts of errors prior to publication.

That would be a good question for IANA, since we I don't see the updated 
Registry before it gets published. Sometimes I mock one up and compare 
it with the released version when it is published, but I didn't do that 
this time, and in any case I didn't run it through my validation tool as 
Dave (thankfully) did.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

[1] 
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2017-January/013578.html

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.