Re: Missed "Added" field for pahawh2, pahawh3, pahawh4 variants
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E16A542BEB894F9DA7D811EFE3E55D8E@DougEwell> |
Dave Pifke wrote: > The entries for pahawh2, pahawh3, and pahawh4 as they currently exist > in > https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry > are missing this field. > > I assume this was an oversight and can be easily corrected. This was my mistake. The proposed records I posted at [1] were missing the Added field. I was on vacation at the time, and the errors escaped the one-week review period without being spotted (only the registration form requires the full two weeks), but this was still my responsibility. Probably I copied and pasted the records directly from the registration forms, which never include an Added date (see Figure 5), and forgot to add it. I was busy last night, but Amanda Baber at IANA figured out what needed to be done, confirmed them with me, made the necessary changes, and posted a corrected Registry around 7 pm local time on a Friday night. This was definitely an "above and beyond" moment and I want to thank Amanda for her dedication and expertise in getting this done. > RFC 5646 section 3.1.2. Record and Field Definitions states that each > entry in the registry MUST contain at least one instance of Added. Actually, the spec is a bit loose here: every entry must have *exactly* one Added field. It would make no sense for a record to have two; I'd consider that a structural error. > I have some Go code which downloads and parses the registry. If > there's interest, I'd be happy to submit an automated test suite to > catch these sorts of errors prior to publication. That would be a good question for IANA, since we I don't see the updated Registry before it gets published. Sometimes I mock one up and compare it with the released version when it is published, but I didn't do that this time, and in any case I didn't run it through my validation tool as Dave (thankfully) did. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org [1] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2017-January/013578.html _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages