Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux

Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Organization Aoyama Gakuin University
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I tend to concur with Kent, for the many reasons he gives below.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2017/02/24 11:02, Kent Karlsson wrote:
>
> Den 2017-02-23 05:39, skrev "Peter Constable" <[email protected]>:
>
>> - having a way to select spans or other elements for applying particular
>> styling (a CSS class will do)
>>
>> - having a way to keep words not supported in English spelling dictionaries
>> from being marked as false-positive mis-spellings (lang="zxx" or lang="und"
>> would do)
>
> Needing to have both a class (for styling) and a language tagging (avoiding
> false spell error indications) seems excessive. Fortunately, CSS allows
> styling based on language tag.
>
> As for styling (to, say, italic), styling directly is not the best way.
> It is better to have a "semantic" marking of some kind, and then style
> on that "semantic" (whether the "semantic" type is indicated by a class
> (in HTML), language tagging or something else).
>
> Taken together, using a language tag for this "semantic type"
> (scientific species names) seems appropriate. However, using 'zxx' (no
> linguistic content) or 'und' (undetermined language) for this seem
> inappropriate.
>
> So even though scientific species names don't really constitute a language,
> nor is really a dialect or orthographic variety of a language (Latin),
> a tagging like 'la-linne' (from Carl von Linné; easier to spell than
> 'la-linnaeus') or similar seems to be a pragmatic solution. Admittedly, that
> may be taken as a precedent for (say) 'la-medicus' and others. But I don't
> think there will be a flood. Any reason to think there will be a flood?
>
> Yes, there is the issue of getting this widespread in relevant publications
> (including Wikipedia); but without a standard language tagging, any
> "solutions" (for "semantic" marking of scientific species names) will be
> more ad hoc and indeed more varied. Not a good idea either.
>
> /Kent K
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.