Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aoyama Gakuin University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I tend to concur with Kent, for the many reasons he gives below. Regards, Martin. On 2017/02/24 11:02, Kent Karlsson wrote: > > Den 2017-02-23 05:39, skrev "Peter Constable" <[email protected]>: > >> - having a way to select spans or other elements for applying particular >> styling (a CSS class will do) >> >> - having a way to keep words not supported in English spelling dictionaries >> from being marked as false-positive mis-spellings (lang="zxx" or lang="und" >> would do) > > Needing to have both a class (for styling) and a language tagging (avoiding > false spell error indications) seems excessive. Fortunately, CSS allows > styling based on language tag. > > As for styling (to, say, italic), styling directly is not the best way. > It is better to have a "semantic" marking of some kind, and then style > on that "semantic" (whether the "semantic" type is indicated by a class > (in HTML), language tagging or something else). > > Taken together, using a language tag for this "semantic type" > (scientific species names) seems appropriate. However, using 'zxx' (no > linguistic content) or 'und' (undetermined language) for this seem > inappropriate. > > So even though scientific species names don't really constitute a language, > nor is really a dialect or orthographic variety of a language (Latin), > a tagging like 'la-linne' (from Carl von Linné; easier to spell than > 'la-linnaeus') or similar seems to be a pragmatic solution. Admittedly, that > may be taken as a precedent for (say) 'la-medicus' and others. But I don't > think there will be a flood. Any reason to think there will be a flood? > > Yes, there is the issue of getting this widespread in relevant publications > (including Wikipedia); but without a standard language tagging, any > "solutions" (for "semantic" marking of scientific species names) will be > more ad hoc and indeed more varied. Not a good idea either. > > /Kent K _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages