Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+cwSm8AH3ciZV7-far6SESwJ+eNfUqio05nH8tyQJgDH8gTEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 24 February 2017 at 00:19, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > If you mean my initial edits to a few templates, improving hundreds of > thousands of articles after a few minutes work Is it an improvement to move from a consistent model (all taxonomic names are uniformly non-marked-up for language) to an inconsistent one (some taxonomic names on a page are marked up for language, others -- perhaps the majority, depending on the page -- are not)? Cheers, Philip _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages