Re: Esperanto orthography subtags

"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <20170306094608.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.3032a63c95.wbe@email03.godaddy.com>
Michael Everson wrote:

> So... do we need to describe either of these as “standard”? Perhaps:
>
> "H-system orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto”
> "X-system  orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto”
>
> In any case hsistemo and xsistemo would seem to be the better subtags. 

David Starner replied:

> Konwert uses hmetodo and xmetodo, which is probably where I got those
> names. I'm not really attached, either way. Part of the reason I
> included "standard" is to make it clear these weren't just any
> h-system or x-system; perhaps replace it with "the"?

Do we need new records and registration forms? These have to be posted
to the list for a week before approval, in the form that is to be
approved. What are the currently agreed-upon subtag values and
Description fields?
 
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.