Re: Esperanto orthography subtags
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20170306094608.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.3032a63c95.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
Michael Everson wrote: > So... do we need to describe either of these as “standard”? Perhaps: > > "H-system orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto” > "X-system orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto” > > In any case hsistemo and xsistemo would seem to be the better subtags. David Starner replied: > Konwert uses hmetodo and xmetodo, which is probably where I got those > names. I'm not really attached, either way. Part of the reason I > included "standard" is to make it clear these weren't just any > h-system or x-system; perhaps replace it with "the"? Do we need new records and registration forms? These have to be posted to the list for a week before approval, in the form that is to be approved. What are the currently agreed-upon subtag values and Description fields? -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages