Re: Esperanto orthography subtags
Michael Everson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think the -sistemo forms are more accurate. I don’t mind if “standard” is retained in the description if David likes it better. > On 6 Mar 2017, at 16:46, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael Everson wrote: > >> So... do we need to describe either of these as “standard”? Perhaps: >> >> "H-system orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto” >> "X-system orthographic fallback for spelling Esperanto” >> >> In any case hsistemo and xsistemo would seem to be the better subtags. > > David Starner replied: > >> Konwert uses hmetodo and xmetodo, which is probably where I got those >> names. I'm not really attached, either way. Part of the reason I >> included "standard" is to make it clear these weren't just any >> h-system or x-system; perhaps replace it with "the"? > > Do we need new records and registration forms? These have to be posted > to the list for a week before approval, in the form that is to be > approved. What are the currently agreed-upon subtag values and > Description fields? > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org > _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages