Re: Forms for July 2017 changes to ISO 15924

Michael Everson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 31 Jul 2017, at 17:53, Mark Davis ☕️ <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Adding a name in a core language to help distinguish an entry from others is good.
> 
> But is "na²¹ɕi³³ to³³ba²¹" really the way the script is really is spelled in a native language using that script?

No; they write https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dongba_symbols#/media/File:Naxi-dongba.png

The autonyms for the script itself are (in Rock’s transcription, which is a bit difficult to match up to more modern transcriptions) ²ss ³dgyu ‘wood record’ and ²lv ³dgyu ‘stone record’, but the “name” of the scripts as they are known generally are Naxi Geba and Naxi Dongba. But those are Pinyin romanizations, based on Han phonology, so the Naxi romanizations were given. 

> On 31 Jul 2017, at 19:15, Mark Davis ☕️ <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The purpose in the registry of a name for ascript is to enable people to distinguish it from other scripts. So the question is whether any significant community would be unable to distinguish Naxi Geba from other scripts, but would be able if "na²¹ɕi³³ to³³ba²¹" were another description.

The registry specifies standard codes for the representation of the names of scripts. Sometimes scripts have more than one name, or there is more than one way of writing the name. Often scripts are not widely known, so it is handy tobe able to say that "yes, this name is represented by that code element”.

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 08:59, Hugh Paterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> My impression of Naxi, having only met one linguist researcher who has worked in those communites, is that the communities use a logographic script, but couldn't that be determined for sure by consulting the ISO script to see what is the code range of unicode characters are refernced in the script?

Neither Naxi Dongba nor Naxi Geba is yet encoded. Andrew West and I are working with Chinese colleagues to get somewhere with that. It isn’t easy. 

Michael Everson
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.