Re: Forms for July 2017 changes to ISO 15924
Peter Constable <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DM2PR21MB00285A9914AA90183D9C379FD5B30@DM2PR21MB0028.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> |
Duh! In this case, the script is associated with a particular language. So, script name as pronounced by the primary community. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Ietf-languages [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Everson Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 4:25 AM To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Forms for July 2017 changes to ISO 15924 On 31 Jul 2017, at 18:16, Peter Constable <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was not asking "what are they doing here". My only concern is that, if we are providing a phonetic transcription of a language name, that it should be the autoglossonym as pronounced by a native speaker. ISO 15924 specifies codes for the representation of the names of scripts. Michael Everson _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fietf-languages&data=04%7C01%7Cpetercon%40microsoft.com%7C75ca3ac7c9014286ed0e08d4d8d0e634%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636371839110710744%7CUnknown%7CVW5rbm93bnx7IlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiT3RoZXIifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=m72ul9kwq24e6fo8%2BReBW7ruB9OvqdzQ8VtzTSrD2b0%3D&reserved=0