Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)

Élie_Roux wrote:

> Well, then what about people using SLP1 instead of IAST? would that
> also be sa-Latn too although it would be a completely different way of
> writing?

So then there would be two "native" Latin-based writing systems?

If the distinctions were significant enough require separate tagging, I
suppose that would call for variant subtags. Here we do make a basic
distinction between a native writing system using script X, and
transliteration into script X of a language not natively written in that
script.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org


_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages