Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)

IAST is marginally an independent script for Sanskrit:  SLP1 is a
transliteration from Devanagari mapping ASCII characters 1-1 to Devanagari
characters.

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Élie_Roux wrote:
>
> > Well, then what about people using SLP1 instead of IAST? would that
> > also be sa-Latn too although it would be a completely different way of
> > writing?
>
> So then there would be two "native" Latin-based writing systems?
>
> If the distinctions were significant enough require separate tagging, I
> suppose that would call for variant subtags. Here we do make a basic
> distinction between a native writing system using script X, and
> transliteration into script X of a language not natively written in that
> script.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages