Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)

> So then there would be two "native" Latin-based writing systems?

yes

> If the distinctions were significant enough require separate tagging,
> I suppose that would call for variant subtags.

Ok

> Here we do make a basic distinction between a native writing system
> using script X, and transliteration into script X of a language not
> natively written in that script.

Sure... so if we take the hypothesis that SPL1 and IAST are native ways
to write Sanskrit in Latn, we could have sa-Latn-slpone and sa-Latn-iast0?

Thank you,
-- 
Elie