Re: bo: suppress script Tibt

Well, I have some sympathy with Élie’s dislike of the unwieldy format of the -t- format, but if that’s what people are doing, that’s what they are doing.

> On 2 Apr 2018, at 17:34, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Michael Everson wrote:
> 
>> I don’t see a strong reason to proceed with this, or a strong request
>> for it either.
> 
> OK, no Suppress-Script. What about Élie's proposed variant for Extended
> Wylie, or for that matter, one for non-extended Wylie? Are we going to
> register a subtag for that or leave it to the T extension, as we have
> done for other transliteration schemes for the past 7 years?
> 
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages