Re: A code for standard Zhuang
David Starner <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Apr 2018 02:04:57 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMZ=zj59QxcP2xjjfCD-Z4v6x--LU2RC05ZWQoyb2j-C=R+hyA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > David Starner wrote: > > > Wikipedia currently implies there is a problem, by giving the ISO > > 639-3 tag of mis to Standard Zhuang, > > The Wikipedia article on "Zhuang languages" says: > > "Standard Zhuang is based on the northern Zhuang dialect of Wuming." > > which, just by itself, without any additional research such as you and > John have considered, implies that Standard Zhuang should be coded > 'zyb', including on the "Standard Zhuang" page. > However, Johnkn63 at Wikimedia says "There is a world of difference between Standard Zhuang and zyb, Standard Zhuang simply uses zyb phonemes, the vocabulary and spelling are not based on zyb. Anyone taking the Standard Zhuang language test and answering the questions in zyb would fail, for that matter a zyb person who had not studied Standard Zhuang would not be able to understand many of the questions." > Assigning a separate ISO 639 code element to Standard Zhuang might cause > issues similar to the assignment of separate code elements for Tagalog > and Filipino. While Filipino is called an "enriched and developed" > version of Tagalog, many people see the two names as equivalent, or at > best, see Filipino as a standardized dialect of Tagalog, and regard the > assignment of two different language code elements as confusing. > I think an Arabic-like model might be more likely; "za" continues to be the usual tag for Standard Zhuang, and Standard Zhuang is Zhuang to most people, with the individual dialects being of little respect. _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages