Re: A code for standard Zhuang
Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:51:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:04:57AM +0000, David Starner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: >> The Wikipedia article on "Zhuang languages" says: >> >> "Standard Zhuang is based on the northern Zhuang dialect of Wuming." >> >> which, just by itself, without any additional research such as you and >> John have considered, implies that Standard Zhuang should be coded >> 'zyb', including on the "Standard Zhuang" page. >> > > However, Johnkn63 at Wikimedia says "There is a world of difference between > Standard Zhuang and zyb, Standard Zhuang simply uses zyb phonemes, the > vocabulary and spelling are not based on zyb. Anyone taking the Standard > Zhuang language test and answering the questions in zyb would fail, for > that matter a zyb person who had not studied Standard Zhuang would not be > able to understand many of the questions." There’s nothing in that statement to contradict the notion that Standard Zhuang, as a whole, is a standard form of Yongbei Zhuang [zyb]. In fact, if anything, it reinforces that notion: why else consider the situation of a native speaker of Yongbei Zhuang taking the Standard Zhuang language test? A native English speaker who only relies on their mother tongue ability, has a vocabulary limited to everyday needs, and has not learnt to spell consistently, would most likely fail a language test in English in like manner. > I think an Arabic-like model might be more likely; "za" continues to be the > usual tag for Standard Zhuang, and Standard Zhuang is Zhuang to most > people, with the individual dialects being of little respect. Yes, I’m also wondering whether using just [za] wouldn’t be both more sensible and better serve the community. That’s what most other Wikipedias do, after all: [zh] for Chinese, not [cmn]; [ar] for Arabic, not [arb], [pt] for Portuguese, not [pt-br] and [pt-pt], etc. An unfortunate exception to that is the coexistence of separate Wikipedias in Serbian [sr], Croatian [hr], Serbocroatian [sh], and Bosnian [bs]. Best, Arthur _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages