Re: Swaziland becomes Eswatini
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:31:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180717153109.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.955fa6564e.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
Hugh Paterson wrote: > In my professional writing I have never had an objection to using an > autonym including its normalized capitalization in its orthography > (especially when it is a Latin script). The issue, at least for me, is NOT about being personally unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the capitalization "eSwatini." The issue, as I keep saying, is that both ISO 3166 and the government of the country in question use the capitalization "Eswatini" in English-language contexts. Section 3.1.5 says that Description values are not "guaranteed to be in any particular language." Nevertheless, most region names in the Registry do happen to be the English names. We use "Germany," for example, not "Deutschland" or "Allemagne" or "Njemačka" or "ドイツ". So I am proposing the name as it appears in English-language contexts, according to the authorities that seem to have a say in this. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages