Re: Language Subtag Registration
Nicholas Felker <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:20:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKaQzEr6a4-Rymp1FWsT5tX_kJuP-hTCVRC5di2bHUV4PRdOyg@mail.gmail.com> |
Unlike the case of one's cousin speaking a bit oddly or an informal accent, there are actually a number of scholarly analyses of Philadelphia English, such as Professor William Labov who has written a number of linguistic books and commenting on the dialect of Philadelphia. -Nick On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:01 PM Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > CE Whitehead wrote: > > > eventually I suppose we will get subtags for all dialects > > I don't see any basis for supposing that. Even if it were possible to > define and identify "all dialects," and practical to characterize and > exemplify them, a case would still have to be made for the utility of > each such subtag for tagging content. > > > there is yet no subtag for English as spoken in Brooklyn or New York > > but some dialects such as New Foundland do have subtags. > > Newfoundland English differs in more than just accent and a limited set > of regional terms. As the references cited by the registration form > showed, there are grammatical differences as well. > > > I do think that the accents though vary with city location > > It's almost never just about accents, and shouldn't be really. Once you > get past a handful of very well-known regional accents, the line between > "Michigan English" and "the way my cousin in Sault Ste. Marie talks" > becomes very vague. > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org > > _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages