Re: Last Call: 'LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator' to Proposed Standard

Hi Mark,
	It is in the RFC Editor's queue, and it will be done before
this one.  So if you put in a reference to the i-d, it will be updated
to the RFC number.
			Ted

At 3:46 PM -0500 12/15/04, Mark Smith wrote:
>Larry Masinter wrote:
>>It would be nicer if this document were rewritten to
>>be consistent with RFC2396bis, which made some
>>changes to the BNF from RFC 2396.
>>
>>          draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt
>
>Good point.
>
>A quick look at the above I-D tells me it would not be too difficult 
>to change draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-08.txt to reference the above I-D 
>(but I have not tried to make the required edits, so I am not 100% 
>sure).
>
>The question is whether the LDAPBis documents should reference the 
>RFC2396bis draft or continue to reference RFCs 2396 and 2732.  How 
>close to "done" is RFC2396bis?
>
>-Mark