Re: authmeth-15 notes

"Roger Harrison" <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:28:02 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldapbis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I searched for this yesterday but must have had my search criteria
wrong. I have now fixed section 3.1.4.  Section C.0 is a historical
record of changes made to the document and will disappear as the draft
moves to an RFC, so I'm not going to change it.
 
Roger

>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <[email protected]> 10/20/2005 3:46:15
pm >>>
Roger Harrison writes:
> Authmeth-16 is no longer using the term graceful closure. I believe
this
> issue is now adequately resolved. Please let me know if you
disagree.

Actually, the draft still talks to about graceful TLS removal/closure
in 3.1.4 and C.0.  Don't know if that was a mistake or intentional.

It's not very important anymore, sinced the original issue is fixed. 
(A
long client-specific sentence is gone, and a wrong [Protocol]
section).

-- 
Hallvard