Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:50:07 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Michael Ströder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >>> I'd be in favour of relaxing this to MAY cn in RFC2307bis. >> >> See BCP 118 [RFC 4521], Section 5 concerning IETF rules for changing previously published schema definitions. > > Yes, but RFC2307bis also changes posixGroup schema. Don’t expect I-Ds which violate BCPs to become RFCs. — Kurt > > Ciao, Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext