Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:42:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Michael Ströder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >>>> I'd be in favour of relaxing this to MAY cn in RFC2307bis. >>> >>> See BCP 118 [RFC 4521], Section 5 concerning IETF rules for changing previously published schema definitions. >> >> Yes, but RFC2307bis also changes posixGroup schema. > > Don’t expect I-Ds which violate BCPs to become RFCs. Are you saying that draft-howard-rfc2307bis will never become an RFC because it changes the declaration of 'posixGroup' ('member' instead of 'memberUID') defined in the experimental RFC 2307? Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.2 KB) - not displayed