RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments onLCU P draft - opaque cookie

Christopher Apple <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The guidelines I recommended for modifying the document
have been adopted by the document editors. Specifically
about the label/OID, these guidelines indicate that the
document should describe how implementations are to
respond when they encounter labels/OIDs that they do not
natively support or understand. That is quite different
than stating formally in the spec that the labels are
irrelevant. As a co-chair, I wouldn't recommend that
a WG document be considered for IESG Last Call if it had
features explicitly specified, but specified as irrelevant.

Chris Apple
Program Manager - Directory Services
United Messaging Inc.
<http://www.unitedmessaging.com>
<mailto:[email protected]> 
(V) 610-425-2860


   >-----Original Message-----
   >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
   >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:25 AM
   >To: Kurt D. Zeilenga
   >Cc: Christopher Apple; [email protected]; 
   >'Richard Huber';
   >[email protected]; [email protected]
   >Subject: Re: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments
   >onLCU P draft - opaque cookie
   >
   >
   >I think the language in our (the LCUP authors') working 
   >version of the draft is sufficient.  As Mark said, the new 
   >version will be
   >out shortly.
   >
   >"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
   >
   >> Well, my concern is that by labeling a value (the cookie)
   >> which the client should not care about will lead to
   >> interoperability problems as clients will start caring
   >> about a label which shouldn't matter.  As the value of
   >> the cookie matters to the protocol peer which generated
   >> it, the label seems quite pointless to me.  However, as
   >> long as there is language added to the text stating that
   >> the label is irrelevant to the clients implementing this
   >> specification, I can live with it.
   >>
   >> Kurt
   >
Chris Apple (E-mail).vcf (text/x-vcard, 498 B)
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Apple;Chris
FN:Chris Apple (E-mail)
ORG:UMI
TITLE:Program Manager
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(610) 425-2860
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(215) 873-0850
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(610) 585-4241
TEL;WORK;FAX:(610) 425-6501
ADR;WORK:;;1161 McDermott Drive;West Chester;Pa.;19380;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:1161 McDermott Drive=0D=0AWest Chester, Pa. 19380=0D=0AUnited States of Amer=
ica
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[email protected]
REV:20010621T205341Z
END:VCARD
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 2.2 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.