RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments onLCU P draft - opaque cookie

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 09:11 AM 7/6/2001, Christopher Apple wrote:
>The guidelines I recommended for modifying the document
>have been adopted by the document editors. Specifically
>about the label/OID, these guidelines indicate that the
>document should describe how implementations are to
>respond when they encounter labels/OIDs that they do not
>natively support or understand.

My point is that a client should not care what the
labels/OIDs are.  It should just return the cookie to
the server.  A client which cares will cease to
interoperate with servers providing other labels/OIDs.

Kurt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.