RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments onLCU P draft - opaque cookie
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:11 AM 7/6/2001, Christopher Apple wrote: >The guidelines I recommended for modifying the document >have been adopted by the document editors. Specifically >about the label/OID, these guidelines indicate that the >document should describe how implementations are to >respond when they encounter labels/OIDs that they do not >natively support or understand. My point is that a client should not care what the labels/OIDs are. It should just return the cookie to the server. A client which cares will cease to interoperate with servers providing other labels/OIDs. Kurt