Re: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:51 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >I don't get it... A synchronizeAndPersist session should return the >complete copy, then drop into the "persist" mode. What am I missing? A sync to persist transition notification. >Jim > >>>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> 09/03/02 11:50PM >>> >At 10:23 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >>Why is there a suggestion in Section 6 to "perform an initial >>synchronization...(synchronizeOnly)" and then immediately perform a >>synchronizeAndPersist session? Why not just perform a >>synchronizeAndPersist session to begin with? > >Because the client has no other way to determine that >it presently has a complete copy of the DIT fragment. > >Kurt