Re: LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:36 PM 2002-09-03, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >At 10:20 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >>The scenario I was thinking of is one where the base existed when a >>persistent LCUP session starts, but later is renamed or deleted. > >LCUP should be clear on the expected behavior here... Client Considerations implies noSuchObject is returned in this case. This needs to be detailed in Section 4 (along with many other protocol details found in sections 6 and 7).