Re: A philosophical question about large directory structures
Erik Skovgaard <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:13:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas,
The DC namespace is poorly suited for the Directory since the Internet host
names are not all guessable. For instance, if I were to look up Canadian
Airlines, I would have to *know* that the hostname is 'cdnair.com'.
Since the Directory name registration is closely tied to the legal names of
companies in most countries, I think that makes for a much better choice.
I would rather find Canadian Airlines as {o=Canadian Airlines, c=ca} than
the somewhat cryptic {dc=cdnair, dc=com}.
Cheers, ....Erik.
-----------------------------------
Erik Skovgaard
GeoTrain Corp.
http://www.geotrain.com
Enterprise Directory Planning Services
At 09:35 99/06/23 +0200, Thomas Lenggenhager wrote:
>On Wednesday, 23 Jun 1999, Harald Tveit Alvestrand writes:
>> I think no global infrastructure (like namespace) can usefully exist
without a
>> global coordination and a global "something" that works.
>> I sometimes hope I'm wrong.....
>
>The global namespace is around, just not deployed.
>The dc naming based on the DNS namespace.
>
>Thomas
>
> ___________ SWITCH - The Swiss Academic and Research Network ___________
> Thomas Lenggenhager, SWITCH, Limmatquai 138, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
> [email protected] Tel: +41 1 268 1520 Fax: +41 1 268 1568
>
>