Re: A philosophical question about large directory structures
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:19:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Another approach based on "randomly unique identifiers" is some variants
of the UUID schemes that are used in DCE RPC, WEBDAV and a lot of Microsoft
stuff.
At 14:15 23.06.99 -0400, Simon Spero wrote:
>There's no real need to standardise schema; applications and organisations
>will
>have different needs at different times. Where standardisation is useful is in
>attributeTypes. These can be slotted together as needed.
But if applications are to span organizations, organizations have to
agree on a schema for that application.
And if an application is to become multiorganizational (or even global),
that schema may need standardization.
I agree that "the schema" needs to go the way of "the Directory".
But "the schema for the world-wide open <something> service" may yet be a
germane subject for standardization.
Harald A
Seriously afflicted optimist
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway
[email protected]