Re: Destination address in v2 leave message
Kunal Shah <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:18:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
--===============5783152834540184227== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6EUSAACMS0703e_" --_000_4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6EUSAACMS0703e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the non-qu= erier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the pack= et * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer to= section 7 of RFC 2236. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of I= ndranil Bhattacharya Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message Hi, Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as= destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending= it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway. Thanks, Indranil --_000_4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6EUSAACMS0703e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6002.18494" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D771421318-13102011><FONT color=3D= #0000ff><FONT=20 face=3DArial size=3D2>Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiv= ing a=20 leave the non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to </FONT><FONT=20 face=3DArial size=3D2>[Max Response Time] in the packet * [Last Member= Query=20 Count] </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but will not send the leave. Plea= se refer=20 to section 7 of RFC 2236.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft> <HR tabIndex=3D-1> <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> [email protected]=20 [mailto:[email protected]] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Indranil=20 Bhattacharya<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM<BR><B>To:<= /B>=20 [email protected]<BR><B>Subject:</B> [magma] Destination address in v2 leave=20 message<BR></FONT><BR></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Hi,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using= =20 queriers address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any=20 advantage of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leav= e=20 message anyway.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks,</DIV> <DIV>Indranil</DIV></BODY></HTML> --_000_4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6EUSAACMS0703e_-- --===============5783152834540184227== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma --===============5783152834540184227==--