Re: Destination address in v2 leave message

--===============3994834914143508626==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6d9fead352d04af3415c7

--001485f6d9fead352d04af3415c7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Kunal,

            Non-queriers lower the group timers upon receiving
group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave messages. Please
refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non-querier.

Thanks,
Indranil

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
> Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the
> non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in
> the packet * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please
> refer to section 7 of RFC 2236.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Indranil Bhattacharya
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
>
>   Hi,
>
>     Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as
> destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending
> it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Indranil
>

--001485f6d9fead352d04af3415c7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>Hi Kunal,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Non-queriers lower the group timers =
upon receiving group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave =
messages. Please refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non=
-querier.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Indranil<br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">kunal.shah@er=
icsson.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex=
; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote"><u></u>
<div>
<div dir=3D"ltr" align=3D"left"><span><font color=3D"#0000ff"><font size=3D=
"2" face=3D"Arial">Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving=
 a leave the non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to </font><font=
 size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">[Max=A0Response Time] in the packet * [Last Memb=
er Query Count] </font><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">but will not send th=
e leave. Please refer to section 7 of RFC 2236.</font></font></span></div>
<br>
<div dir=3D"ltr" lang=3D"en-us" align=3D"left">
<hr>
<font size=3D"2" face=3D"Tahoma"><b>From:</b> <a href=3D"mailto:magma-bounc=
[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a> [mailto:<a href=
=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]=
</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Indranil Bhattacharya<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href=3D"m=
ailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a><br><b>Subject:</=
b> [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message<br></font><br></div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class=3D"h5">
<div></div>
<div>Hi,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>=A0=A0=A0 Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers=
 address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage=
=A0of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message an=
yway.</div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Indranil</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001485f6d9fead352d04af3415c7--

--===============3994834914143508626==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
magma mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma

--===============3994834914143508626==--