RE: mboned: draft-liu-magma-igmpv3-mldv2-lite-00.txt
"Manfredi, Albert E" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma,gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA7D9B4A761066448304A6AFC09ABDA986E7A6@XCH-NE-1V2.ne.nos.boeing.com> |
I have a couple of comments only to this: -------Original Message----- > From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]] > Specific comments: > > 1) Don't use the term ASM in the draft. Refer to > "Exclude(NULL)" as > joining a (*,G) entry rather than a specific (Si,G) entry. Same > for the "Include(All)" case. I would prefer to see, at least once in the beginning, that joining (*,G) is equivalent to ASM. This makes it clear that IGMPv3/MLDv2 are also usable for ASM, to potentially replace all previous versions of IGMP and MLD. Also, maybe I've missed something obvious, but clearly EXCLUDE(null) means joining (*,G) like ASM. What does INCLUDE(null) mean? Below: > o Current-State-Include, where when the source count > is non-zero, it > is the host joining the various (Si,G), where each > Si is in the source > list. When the source count is zero, the host is > joining (*,G). implies it means the same thing as EXCLUDE(null). But logically, I don't see that. Bert