Babel maintenance included in future work?

Hi Donald,

I need a confirmation from you regarding Babel, will there be a merge or
not?

In previous meetings [1, 2] of MANET WG and on the Babel_mailing_list [3,
4], it was stated that by WG chairs of both WGs that the *plan* is to join
participants of Babel within MANET WG, so that was mentioned to merge in
MANET and that we re-charter MANET WG.

Please help/confirm_to me with this request because I mentioned in my draft
of re-charter that we have in MANET WG the Babel maintenance and I remember
you presenting for that.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-117-manet-202307260000/
[2]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2023-manet-01-202309261300/
[3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/70jH6HQq9YvEL2KOc6JULc_LSew/
[4]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/?gbt=1&index=70jH6HQq9YvEL2KOc6JULc_LSew
[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-babel/

Therefore, I think we need a plan/agreed_draft for re-charter, and please
help me/WG with a clear plan/milestones that we can work/discuss forward
and we can make more drafts/discussions/decisions.

I prepared a draft for myself and published here in the mailing list as it
is my reference re-charter (and will continue this for future so that we
agree on one clear on), so until we get discussions/consensus we change
according to that.

Best regards
AB

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet