Re: Discussion of WG charter draft
Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnDZ8_CFe982wHB19r=sFE3KxwSi7xrT_c1i86onujcL5F4vA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:44 AM Abdussalam Baryun < [email protected]> wrote: > [...] > - IMHO there was a change of some of the meeting_re-charter_presentations > from the WG chairs without discussions of that on the list. So I am not > sure why was the changes made or why the plan was changed (i.e. removal of > Babel maintenance). > > Sorry, one point I made it was mistaken regarding this item of Babel, it was not removed, but we need to discuss it on the list by both WGs participants, and how we work together the plan forward. > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:42 AM Abdussalam Baryun < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> update to my points with Ronald's as from meeting: >> >> - The MANET WG is responsible for the maintenance of OLSRv2 [RFC 7181], >> NHDP [RFC 6130] and the Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format [RFC5444], >> and their extensions – Keep, obvious. Potential topics: >> >> ○ Guidance on use of (lesser known) OLSRv2 features to accommodate >> specific use cases (informational document) >> ○ Hybrid proactive / reactive operation based on an OLSRv2 extension >> ○ Hybrid proactive / DTN operation based an OLSRv2 extension >> ○ Better MPR selection heuristics >> ○ Guidance on OLSRv2 restart >> ○ RFC 7779 (DAT Metric) to Proposed Standard >> ○ RFC 7722 (Multi-Topology Extension to OLSRv2) to Proposed Standard >> ○ Others? >> >> - Potential new work items on the revised charter: >> ● DLEP Maintenance & Extensions – Obvious >> ● Babel Maintenance & Extensions – Obvious >> > I agree with Babel maintenace Best regards AB _______________________________________________ manet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet