[manet] Re: Requesting a channel characteristic over DLEP

Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <CADnDZ8_atGgAS0DtE_1B0GhC9zq=ih=fyJQU=2=9fWnB1qxEgA@mail.gmail.com>
I think there should be an opinion by time-variant routing technology/WG.
Even though tvr WG may not have the DLEP as a must but there should be some
kind of PHY information required by the routers.

best wishes,
AB

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:46 AM Henning Rogge <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nobody has an opinion on a "Request Session/Channel/Interface
> Characteristic" extension for DLEP?
>
> Henning Rogge
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:01 AM Henning Rogge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry,
> >
> > maybe channel was a bad word...
> >
> > I was thinking about characteristics for the whole "radio channel" or
> > interface. On the same level as the DLEP session.
> >
> > Henning Rogge
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:53 AM Rick Taylor
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Henning,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I fully understand your "channel" concept, and therefore
> I'm really not sure how it fits within the existing DLEP data model
> (destinations and links between), and I think this might also be the cause
> of your uncertainty of which mechanism is correct or missing.
> > >
> > > In your model is a "channel" a shared medium that can affect a (sub-)
> group of links, or something else?  Or have a I missed a definition in one
> of the other drafts?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: manet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henning
> Rogge
> > > > Sent: 03 May 2024 08:05
> > > > To: MANET IETF
> > > > Subject: [manet] Requesting a channel characteristic over DLEP
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am working on a fourth DLEP PHY related draft, which will allow the
> > > > router to dynamically change some channel specific attributes when I
> > > > noticed we have no mechanism for this in DLEP.
> > > >
> > > > We have "Request Link Characteristics", but no comparable mechanism
> > > > for the whole radio channel.
> > > >
> > > > Do we need a "Request Channel Characteristics" Draft first?
> > > >
> > > > Henning Rogge
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > manet mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.