[manet] Re: Requesting a channel characteristic over DLEP
Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnDZ8_atGgAS0DtE_1B0GhC9zq=ih=fyJQU=2=9fWnB1qxEgA@mail.gmail.com> |
I think there should be an opinion by time-variant routing technology/WG. Even though tvr WG may not have the DLEP as a must but there should be some kind of PHY information required by the routers. best wishes, AB On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:46 AM Henning Rogge <[email protected]> wrote: > Nobody has an opinion on a "Request Session/Channel/Interface > Characteristic" extension for DLEP? > > Henning Rogge > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:01 AM Henning Rogge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, > > > > maybe channel was a bad word... > > > > I was thinking about characteristics for the whole "radio channel" or > > interface. On the same level as the DLEP session. > > > > Henning Rogge > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:53 AM Rick Taylor > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Henning, > > > > > > I'm not sure I fully understand your "channel" concept, and therefore > I'm really not sure how it fits within the existing DLEP data model > (destinations and links between), and I think this might also be the cause > of your uncertainty of which mechanism is correct or missing. > > > > > > In your model is a "channel" a shared medium that can affect a (sub-) > group of links, or something else? Or have a I missed a definition in one > of the other drafts? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: manet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henning > Rogge > > > > Sent: 03 May 2024 08:05 > > > > To: MANET IETF > > > > Subject: [manet] Requesting a channel characteristic over DLEP > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am working on a fourth DLEP PHY related draft, which will allow the > > > > router to dynamically change some channel specific attributes when I > > > > noticed we have no mechanism for this in DLEP. > > > > > > > > We have "Request Link Characteristics", but no comparable mechanism > > > > for the whole radio channel. > > > > > > > > Do we need a "Request Channel Characteristics" Draft first? > > > > > > > > Henning Rogge > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > manet mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]