[manet] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-e ther-credit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 4:  If changes are made to update the Security Consideration sections
of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification and
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control, I recommend this draft reference one
or both of those drafts.

Section 4:  Wildcards are literally mentioned only in the Introduction and
here. I certainly don't mind the recommendation in this section, but should
this be a standalone paragraph?  And should it appear in some/all of the other
drafts in the group?

Section 4, last sentence:  Does this apply to the wildcard topic?  Or something
else, maybe the second sentence?  I think this section could use some
restructuring.



_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]