[manet] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet -dlep-traffic-classification-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <CAL0qLwa=sJUsxy7_PUgSgVZw0KHLk_H9Ei0wgCL-djHN0V_S0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:45 AM Don Fedyk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the fast response perhaps we can resolve this.
>
> We asked for a Traffic Classification code entry out of an existing block
> This has its own registry that has two entries based on the traffic
> marking for QoS either Diff Serv Code Points or Ethernet DSCPs.  If any
> other entries desired in they future , they would have to be some
> identifier in a packet or a frame that could be used to indicate a separate
> queue/QoS treatment.   We left that for future.
> We expect a new draft will have to be written that justifies the entry.
>
> So how do we make that more clear?
>

If someone asks for a code point in your Specification Required range, IANA
will forward that request to whoever you offer to appoint as the Designated
Expert.  That person has to either approve the request, or reply explaining
why that request needs correction or should be rejected.  How would you
like that person to go about making that decision?  What criteria do you
want them to apply?

That's what needs to go in Section 5.2.

-MSK

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.