[manet] Re: Extended: Call for adoption: draft-templin-m anet-inet-05

--===============3876368190216462822==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000062fbda065132fdef"

--00000000000062fbda065132fdef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Donald,

Thanks for your email/decision, and I would like to know the response to
the call from co-chairs regarding adoption, what do they think as
participants. I seen only Don have input his adoption support as
participant, but I think you and Ronald did not input any reaction to the
call, without hats,


On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 6:53=E2=80=AFPM Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> w=
rote:

> Hi,
>
> There has been some discussion of this call for adoption but the
> chairs would welcome more feedback.


That is ok, more feedback is important/good for the WG, but IMHO in IETF it
is always important/good to have also draft-feedback from WG co-chairs
without hats. I think that WG co-chair feedback as participants can help to
encourage volunteering within WG, because they are the main wg-volunteers.

best regards,

AB

--00000000000062fbda065132fdef
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi=C2=A0Donald,<div><br></div><div>Thanks=
 for your=C2=A0email/decision, and I would like to know the response=C2=A0t=
o the=C2=A0call from co-chairs regarding adoption, what do they think as pa=
rticipants. I seen only Don have input his adoption support as participant,=
 but I think you and Ronald did not input any reaction to the call, without=
 hats,</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_=
container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 6:5=
3=E2=80=AFPM Donald Eastlake &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">d3e3e3=
@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding=
-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
There has been some discussion of this call for adoption but the<br>
chairs would welcome more feedback. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>That i=
s ok, more feedback is important/good for the WG, but IMHO in IETF it is al=
ways important/good to have also draft-feedback from WG co-chairs without h=
ats. I think that WG co-chair feedback as participants can help to encourag=
e volunteering within WG, because they are the main wg-volunteers.=C2=A0</d=
iv><div><br></div><div>best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>AB</div></div=
></div>

--00000000000062fbda065132fdef--


--===============3876368190216462822==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbWFuZXQgbWFp
bGluZyBsaXN0IC0tIG1hbmV0QGlldGYub3JnClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwg
dG8gbWFuZXQtbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK

--===============3876368190216462822==--