[manet] Re: Call for adoption: draft-templin-manet-inet-05 (Ends 2026-05-06)

--===============0067874007937365917==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000ce3810651331c12"

--0000000000000ce3810651331c12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Christopher,

On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 3:18=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Dearlove <
[email protected]> wrote:

> My point was that for a solution to be a fit to thi group it needs to
> discuss how it would work with OLSRv2/NHDP. Which mean that the problem
> statement needs to discuss the issue, in some detail.m Which thi draft
> doesn=E2=80=99t.
>

This draft is not solution, but problem statement, so it there is
proposed-solution it can be removed/discussed, because proposed solutions
gives details of the problem, but the main goal is not the proposal, the
main point is the problem to be clarified. In this WG we should not hide
problems from the internet community.

Regarding OLSRv2/NHDP there are many updates as I mentioned before, and
IMHO it needs to be updated in one draft to make it easier to follow by
other solution drafts, but this draft is not solution but problem for all
manet-routing and not just for OLSRv2 routing.


> Whether it is more work than this WG can take on depends on if people ste=
p
> up. I haven=E2=80=99t seen the volunteers yet. But that=E2=80=99s not my =
call, it=E2=80=99s one for
> the chairs/AD.
>

not sure why it is more work while the author is already making the effort
and willing to update/respond to all WG feedback.

AB

--0000000000000ce3810651331c12
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Christopher,</div><br><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On W=
ed, May 6, 2026 at 3:18=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Dearlove &lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; w=
rote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0p=
x 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">My point w=
as that for a solution to be a fit to thi group it needs to discuss how it =
would work with OLSRv2/NHDP. Which mean that the problem statement needs to=
 discuss the issue, in some detail.m Which thi draft doesn=E2=80=99t.<br></=
blockquote><div><br></div><div>This draft is not solution, but problem stat=
ement, so it there is proposed-solution it can be removed/discussed, becaus=
e proposed solutions gives details of the problem, but the main goal is not=
 the proposal, the main point is the problem to be clarified. In this WG we=
 should not hide problems from the internet community.</div><div><br></div>=
<div>Regarding OLSRv2/NHDP there are many updates as I mentioned before, an=
d IMHO it needs to be updated in one draft to make it easier to follow=C2=
=A0by other solution drafts, but this draft is not solution but problem for=
 all manet-routing and not just for OLSRv2 routing.</div><div><br></div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-lef=
t:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Whether it is more work than this WG can take on depends on if people step =
up. I haven=E2=80=99t seen the volunteers yet. But that=E2=80=99s not my ca=
ll, it=E2=80=99s one for the chairs/AD.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div=
>not sure why it is more work while the author is already making the effort=
 and willing to update/respond to all WG feedback.</div><div><br></div><div=
>AB</div></div></div>

--0000000000000ce3810651331c12--


--===============0067874007937365917==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbWFuZXQgbWFp
bGluZyBsaXN0IC0tIG1hbmV0QGlldGYub3JnClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwg
dG8gbWFuZXQtbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK

--===============0067874007937365917==--