Plea / favor: Review and comment on draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

Warren Kumari <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:31:58 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mboned
Message-ID <CAHw9_iL00Gtn9EX+6i4ZjwLbtDOS5QTvDaRP=TTahVuoh5Ohwg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear MBONED,

Pretty please, can you review and comment on the WGLC for
draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and
draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery ?

See the thread labeled: "[MBONED] WGLCs for
draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and
draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery"

The initial WGLC was extended until June 13th to get additional
feedback - "both docs have enjoyed tremendous support from folks in
the meetings/list in the past and there has been no particularly
controversies  noted in either doc."

It will be very discouraging if we cannot get additional comments.

W
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned