Re: WGLCs for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

"Jeffrey \(Zhaohui\) Zhang" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:17:24 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mboned
Message-ID <DM5PR05MB3548801CA903198788E044BCD4EE0@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Support progressing the two documents.

Thanks.
Jeffrey


Juniper Internal

-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 4:44 PM
To: Leonard Giuliano <[email protected]>
Cc: MBONED WG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] WGLCs for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

As an author on one of these documents:

Dear WG,

You expressed interest in these documents, and we've had (IMO) some good discussions on them at meetings
(draft-perkins-intarea-multicast-ieee802 merged into
draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problem) -- I think that the document are an easy read, and serve a useful purpose.

Please take some time to read, and post comments to the list -- as someone who often has to deal with WiFi issues caused from excessive broadcast / multicast, I'd really appreciate this topic getting more review and wider attention.

W




On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:43 AM Leonard Giuliano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> WGLCs have completed for both draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems 
> and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery, and to date, we've only 
> received support on the list for advancing these docs from two and 
> five non-authors, respectively.  This is not enough to determine 
> consensus for advancing either doc.
>
> That said, both docs have enjoyed tremendous support from folks in the 
> meetings/list in the past and there has been no particularly 
> controversies noted in either doc.  As such, we've decided to extend 
> the WGLC for the next 10 days give a little extra time to hear from folks.
>
> Please reply to this if you do/do not support advancing 
> either/both/neither doc by Jun 13.  And further comments on either doc 
> would be welcome.
>
>
> -Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
> man_listinfo_mboned&d=DwIBaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcW
> zoCI&r=f7wsLGcfzAWDNS6XNTBZwj_OLAOsZZqdrR2IDAzeZqE&m=8CcXaPR_rbTgPhpvs
> mYnvAgD2_b_SKYEf2I2AB0f_uY&s=Vif6nKYwxZ0VnvjEFt-tIuXU6YC5LNWoJSdmfkHQc
> w0&e=



--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
   ---maf

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned