Re: WGLCs for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery
Leonard Giuliano <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:30:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.02.1906141328470.2290@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net> |
There appears to be consensus from the WG to advance draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery. Pending the resolution of the latest issues that Bill Atwood brought up this week, we will submit this doc to IESG (Bill- please confirm if Jake’s latest changes resolve your concerns). As for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems, while we would have preferred to see a little more feedback in WGLC, there appears to be consensus to advance this doc as well, particularly in light of the extensive feedback this topic/doc has received the last few years. Authors- please address the concerns that Bill Atwood brought up on this doc as well this week, and pending resolution of those issues, we will submit to IESG. -Chairs On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Leonard Giuliano wrote: | | WGLCs have completed for both draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and | draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery, and to date, we've only received | support on the list for advancing these docs from two and five non-authors, | respectively. This is not enough to determine consensus for advancing either | doc. | | That said, both docs have enjoyed tremendous support from folks in the | meetings/list in the past and there has been no particularly controversies | noted in either doc. As such, we've decided to extend the WGLC for the next | 10 days give a little extra time to hear from folks. | | Please reply to this if you do/do not support advancing either/both/neither | doc by Jun 13. And further comments on either doc would be welcome. | | | -Chairs | _______________________________________________ MBONED mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned