RE: RE: Duplicated Error Code 459

Do agree.

I’m not aware of any H.248.18 implementation.

There isn’t any standardized profile with H.248.18 support, too.

-Albrecht

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 08:10
To: Christian Groves
Cc: megaco ietf; [email protected]; Candice; Lanlan Li; Schwarz Albrecht
Subject: [Megaco] RE: Duplicated Error Code 459

 


In my opinion, The amet package in H.248.26 is used widely,So I  think personally the H.248.18 should be changed. 

BR, 
Michael 




*****************************************
phone：025-52871318，inner：81318

Gateway development department
******************************************




 

Christian Groves <[email protected]> 

2008-01-31 14:34 

        
        收件人：        "Arturo Martin De Nicolas (AC/EED)" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 'Lin Yangbo' <[email protected]>, Tommy Young <[email protected]>, Miri Epstein <[email protected]>, [email protected], Lanlan Li <[email protected]>, Candice <[email protected]>, Michael <[email protected]>, megaco ietf <[email protected]> 
        抄送：         
        主题：        Duplicated Error Code 459




Hello all,

H.248.26 specifies error code #459:
/7.5.1 Invalid Combination of Metering Detection Events
Error Code #: 459
Name: Invalid Combination of Metering Detection Events
Definition: The command was disregarded because the Events Descriptor 
contained more
than one metering detection event.
Error Text in the error Descriptor: --
Comment: –/

However H.248.18 (and the IANA registration page) also specifies error 
code #459 as:
/5.6 Error Codes
This package defines a new error code:
#: 459 Name: Unsupported or Unknown Profile
Definition:
The Profile Name is not supported by the receiver. The command related 
to the unknown
profile is disregarded.
Package: Profile Package prp, 0x0050
Reference: H.248.18
Error Text in the error Descriptor:
The Profile Name is included in the error text in the error descriptor. 
String Length 1 –
67 characters – 64 for name, 1 for "/" and 2 for version.
Comment: −/

This leads to a duplication of error codes numbers. One of the numbers 
needs to be changed. If we take the precedence of the Recommendations 
then H.248.18 should remain and H.248.26 should be changed. However my 
feeling is that H.248.26 currently has a wider usage. I propose the 
usage of the error code number 461. Any preferences on whether H.248.18 
or H.248.26 should be changed?

Any thoughts?

Regards, Christian


--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.



 
--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco