Re: FW: Segmentation and TransactionResponseAck

Hello Kevin,

No its not in the IG. I'll make sure its included in the next version.


Regards, Christian

Kevin Boyle wrote:
> It is a typo.  This might already be fixed in the IG.  If not, then it 
> is certainly something that can be placed there.
>  
> Kevin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 28, 2008 5:09 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Megaco] FW: Segmentation and TransactionResponseAck
>
> Hi,
>  
> Section 'E.14.6 Procedures' (Ref. ITU-T Rec. H.248.1 (09/2005)) 
> dictates that "Upon reception of the final segment, the receiver shall 
> determine if it has received all the message segments. If it has, then 
> the receiver shall respond with a TransactionResponseAcknowledgement."
>  
> Following examples illustrates this, but the Ack is shown as
> K=1
>  
> As per the ABNF for TransactionResponseAcknowledgement,
>
> transactionResponseAck =
>
> ResponseAckToken LBRKT transactionAck *(COMMA transactionAck) RBRKT
>
> transactionAck =
>
> TransactionID / (TransactionID "-" TransactionID)
>
> So K=1 is not a valid format and should be K{1}
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> thanks
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>