Re: G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1

No, I'm referring to the introductory section of Appendix I "Example Call flows" of H.248.1 V3 (09/2005).
 
There it says that "...For example, G.711 A-law is called PCMA in SDP, and is assigned profile 0. G.723.1 is called G723 and is profile 4; H.263 is called H263 and is profile 34. See also http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters."
 
The most recent releases I could find on the internet that contain the above statement are H.248.1 V3 (09/2005) and its Amendment 1 to H.248.1 "Gateway control protocol: Version 3: Corrections and clarifications" (Geneva, 26 June - 6 July 2007)

________________________________

From: ext Schwarz Albrecht [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 5:41 PM
To: Beis, Grigoris (NSN - GR/Athens); [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1



Which particular signaling step(s) you are looking in Appnedix I? Step
12?

[guess we got only "RTP profile for G.723.1 is 4"]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beis, Grigoris
> (NSN - GR/Athens)
> Sent: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 16:30
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1
>
> Hello all,
> 
> I noticed that in Appendix I of both H.248.1 V2 and H.248.1
> V3 documents, G.711 A-law's assigned profile is 0 whereas it
> should have been 8.
> 
> Is this just a typeo?
> 
> BR,
> Greg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>