Re: G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1

right, so that's an item for the Implementers' Guide 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beis, Grigoris (NSN - GR/Athens) [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2008 09:09
> To: Schwarz Albrecht; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1
> 
> No, I'm referring to the introductory section of Appendix I 
> "Example Call flows" of H.248.1 V3 (09/2005).
>  
> There it says that "...For example, G.711 A-law is called 
> PCMA in SDP, and is assigned profile 0. G.723.1 is called 
> G723 and is profile 4; H.263 is called H263 and is profile 
> 34. See also http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters."
>  
> The most recent releases I could find on the internet that 
> contain the above statement are H.248.1 V3 (09/2005) and its 
> Amendment 1 to H.248.1 "Gateway control protocol: Version 3: 
> Corrections and clarifications" (Geneva, 26 June - 6 July 2007)
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: ext Schwarz Albrecht [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 5:41 PM
> To: Beis, Grigoris (NSN - GR/Athens); [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1
> 
> 
> 
> Which particular signaling step(s) you are looking in 
> Appnedix I? Step 12?
> 
> [guess we got only "RTP profile for G.723.1 is 4"]
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beis, Grigoris (NSN - 
> > GR/Athens)
> > Sent: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 16:30
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1
> >
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I noticed that in Appendix I of both H.248.1 V2 and H.248.1
> > V3 documents, G.711 A-law's assigned profile is 0 whereas it should 
> > have been 8.
> > 
> > Is this just a typeo?
> > 
> > BR,
> > Greg
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Megaco mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
> >
> 
> 
>