Re: Questions about VMG
"ZhangXin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Christian, thank you for your prompt reply. I am wondering if the primary purpose of VMG is to reduce the cost for gateway facility? Thanks, Sean ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Groves" <[email protected]> To: "ZhangXin" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [Megaco] Questions about VMG > Hello Sean, > > Please see CNG below. > > Regards, Christian > > ZhangXin wrote: >> Hi list, >> I have 2 questions in H.248, can someone help me? >> 1. In H.248.1 V2 chap.11.1, why we need to divide a Physical MG to one >> or more virtual MGs? What is the advantage of VMG? Only because some >> VMGS can share some hardware and software resource? > [CNG] It allows multiple MGCs to use the same physical MG. Without the > VMG concept there is a one to one relationship between the a > MGC/Physical MG. >> 2. Can a physical MG be divided to a TG(trunk gateway) and an >> AG(access gateway)? > [CNG] Yes, these would be two separate VMGs running an applicable profile. >> Thanks, >> Sean >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Megaco mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >> >