Re: Questions about VMG
Christian Groves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Sean, VMG gives the possibility of different network architectures. Depending on the customer's network and vendor's offering, VMGs may reduce the cost. Regards, Christian ZhangXin wrote: > Hi Christian, > thank you for your prompt reply. > I am wondering if the primary purpose of VMG is to reduce the cost for gateway facility? > > Thanks, > Sean > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christian Groves" <[email protected]> > To: "ZhangXin" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:56 AM > Subject: Re: [Megaco] Questions about VMG > > > >> Hello Sean, >> >> Please see CNG below. >> >> Regards, Christian >> >> ZhangXin wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> I have 2 questions in H.248, can someone help me? >>> 1. In H.248.1 V2 chap.11.1, why we need to divide a Physical MG to one >>> or more virtual MGs? What is the advantage of VMG? Only because some >>> VMGS can share some hardware and software resource? >>> >> [CNG] It allows multiple MGCs to use the same physical MG. Without the >> VMG concept there is a one to one relationship between the a >> MGC/Physical MG. >> >>> 2. Can a physical MG be divided to a TG(trunk gateway) and an >>> AG(access gateway)? >>> >> [CNG] Yes, these would be two separate VMGs running an applicable profile. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Sean >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Megaco mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >>> >>> > >